Found on the Web
We Surf So You Don't Have To


Undeniable Proof That Paul McCartney was Replaced with a Lookalike. I think that anything on the Internet asserting that it is undeniable proof is wide open to denial. If Paul McCartney was in fact replaced in 1966, then they found a replacement with equal talent because his post-1966 stuff was just as good as his previous work. My thought is that if it looks like a Paul and sounds like a Paul, it probably is a Paul.